Why a Universal School Choice Program instead of a Pilot School Choice Program?
A Universal School Choice Program gives all parents of K-12 students in Texas an opportunity to choose the best school for their children.
On the other hand, a Pilot School Choice Program only gives a special group of parents school choice, for example low-income parents whose kids go to inner-city academically unacceptable schools.
The Texas School Choice Movement has tried unsuccessfully to pass a pilot program for the last 15 years. Those who promote a pilot program believe that the legislators typically opposed to school choice can be logically persuaded or emotionally shamed into voting for a pilot program because it is small, and it will help those families with the greatest need for school choice.
The pilot program supporters believe that once the “beachhead” of the pilot program is passed, then the “beachhead” can gradually be expanded toward a universal program. A common analogy in political circles is “getting the camel’s nose under the tent.” Once the camel’s nose is under the tent, the camel can easily pull the tent up with its nose.
This “beachhead” strategy might be right for naval invasion or pulling up a tent, but it doesn’t work in a political “war” against a powerful enemy, the teachers unions. The pilot approach is about persuading or shaming legislators (not voters) into voting for your pilot.
Fundamentally, politics is “civilized war” waged with votes rather than bullets. The fundamental source of power is committed voters, not “persuaded legislators”. Time and energy must be focused on convincing voters, not legislators. When the voters are committed to school choice, then it follows that the legislators will either be convinced or voted out of office. Dedicated voters are the army in political war. Like all armies, they must be motivated, educated, and organized.
But how do you motivate voters if there is no tangible benefit for their effort? A universal school choice program solves this problem, while a pilot program cannot. When every parent in the “political army” is fighting for a school choice opportunity for their child, they are easily motivated. Every parent has a “horse in the race”.
The teachers unions already have an army of committed voters. The army is public school employees. Essentially, the school choice movement has to match our army of voters with its army of voters. Whoever has the biggest, most dedicated, most organized voters wins.
There is an Wall Street Journal article by Howard Rich that makes my point more eloquently than I.