Letters to the Editor about Rhee’s Departure


The WSJ has two letters to the editor printed in response to the editorial entitled “Education Reform Setback.”

The first is a conservative letter coming to the conclusion that the unions position is not about the kids or the teachers. “It’s all about the money, stupid.”

The second is a somewhat incoherent liberal letter. What does the following sentence mean? “Anyone who works for a salary realizes that such an approach could unfairly victimize himself…” If anyone victimizes himself, who is the oppressor? I’m not sure that Mr. Brenner knows what his “own best interest” is.

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: